

Evolution of Taylor Principles of Scientific Management
Frederick Winslow Taylor laid out a few principles, which show that the implementation of scientific management can increase the overall efficiency of the business. He brought about a revolution in the conventional methods of administration.
F.W. Taylor published his principles of scientific management theory through a monograph in 1911. He was one of the intellectual leaders who applied his engineering methods to create a specialised branch of engineering, known as industrial engineering.
Taylor’s vision lay in transferring control of work from the worker’s hands to the management. He believed that by adhering to his principles, an organisation could earn substantially higher than from following conventional management practices.
The scientific methods helped in creating revolutionary ideas for a business, such as training of employees, proper staffing, etc.
Fun Fact: F.W. Taylor is known as the ‘father of scientific management.
Historical Considerations
Frederick Winslow Taylor was one of the first of these thinkers. He was the founder of the Scientific Management movement, and he and his colleagues were the first to scientifically investigate the work process. They looked at how people did their jobs and how it affected their productivity. Taylor's theory was based on the idea that forcing individuals to work as hard as they could was inefficient compared to improving the way they worked.
Taylor's book "The Principles of Scientific Management" was published in 1909. He claimed that increasing productivity might be achieved by streamlining and simplifying jobs. He also promoted the idea of workers and managers cooperating with one another. This was a significant departure from how work was normally done in firms in the past.
About Fredrick Taylor
Frederick Winslow Taylor was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1856 and died in 1915.
Taylor studied and travelled throughout Europe as a youth before enrolling at Phillips Exeter Academy in New Hampshire in 1872.
He was admitted into Harvard Law School after graduation but was unable to go owing to bad eyesight.
Taylor then worked in different manufacturing-related jobs instead of going to university, finally earning a mechanical engineering degree from Stevens Institute of Technology in 1883 and becoming Chief Engineer at Midvale Steel Works in Philadelphia.
He became General Manager of Manufacturing Investment Company after resigning in 1890 but departed in 1893 to pursue a career in engineering management consultancy. Taylor served as President of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers from 1906 to 1907 and then became a professor at Dartmouth College's Tuck School of Business.
Taylor's book "Principles of Scientific Management," published in 1911, is his most famous work. He introduced various management concepts based on the scientific method that might improve the efficiency and productivity of industrial settings in this book.
Taylor is renowned as the "Father of Scientific Management," sometimes known as "Taylorism," as a result of his work.
Reason behind Scientific Management
Because of insufficient capacity and/or education, Taylor felt that workers should be focused on labour, while managers should be held accountable for optimising performance. Workers, in particular, would profit from this approach since it would result in higher salaries, shorter working hours, and better work and home conditions. While Taylor's Theory of Scientific Management has a reputation for being cold and impersonal, this is not the case; his philosophy had good intentions for everyone, and the difficulties stem from inadequate implementation.
What are the Principles of Scientific Management?
In a broader sense, Taylor principles of management is a set of theories that dismisses those traditional ways and rule-of-thumb techniques of managing the workforce. It accepts the application of scientific methods to provide solutions to managerial problems.
It works based on the five principles of management. These include:
Scientific ways, instead rule-of-thumb method: Taylor believed that instead of using conventional methods, all industries should adopt the scientific techniques for essential management decisions. According to him, even the smallest activity can be done through proper scientific planning instead of rule-of-thumb.
Now, what is a rule-of-thumb method? It is a principle that provides simple advice that should be followed in almost all situations. This method develops as a result of experience instead of proper technical research.
Under Taylor’s scientific management theory, decisions are made based on the application of these methods to a problem. He believed that management should make decisions based on cause and effect relationships instead of traditional opinions.
Harmony without any discord: F.W. Taylor indicated that there should be complete harmony between management and its labourers. He believed that it would increase the workflow in an organisation. A clear understanding can bring efficiency to work and create a harmonious relationship between the two components.
According to him, an organisation can increase its productivity if it reduces disputes with the labourers. Workers should not be over-burdened with the workload, and businesses should understand their requirements.
Mental Revolution: Under this principle, both the management and the workers should change their mental approach towards each other. The adoption of scientific methods would bring about a complete shift in the attitude of both the organisation and its employees. He believed that without a mental revolution, there is no scientific management.
The most significant change can take place when an organisation matches their vision with workers. To him, a business can increase its potential when both the top and lower levels of management share similar perspectives.
Coordination between management and workers: Under the Taylor scientific management, there should be complete cooperation between the administration and its workers. It can result in optimum output when a business goes hand-in-hand with its employees.
Both the managers and workers should understand each other’s requirements and work in collaboration. Taylor believed that an individual alone could not optimise the efficiency of work. It requires teamwork, and proper coordination between the different layers of management to increase productivity.
Optimum output: The principle states that any organisation’s growth depends on the skills of its workers. Thus, the scientific approach believes in proper staffing and employee training to maximise output.
The aim of both the management and its workers should be optimising output. Maximum output results in increasing the profits for any business, and it will ensure benefits to both the administration and its workers.
What is the Importance of Scientific Management?
Taylor’s principles of management are known worldwide due to their undeniable significance in the field of management. Some reasons have been explained below:
These principles direct businesses to properly allocate their resources and earn maximum profits.
It ensures quality management and allows a business to strengthen its relations with employees.
These guidelines ensure that a business can increase its productivity by scientifically directing all employees toward the desired objective.
Conclusion
F.W. Taylor published his principles of scientific management theory through a monograph in 1911. He believed that by adhering to his principles, an organisation could earn substantially higher than from following conventional management practices. Taylor's theory was based on the idea that forcing individuals to work as hard as they could would be inefficient compared to improving the way they worked.
FAQs on Taylor's Principles of Scientific Management: Key Insights
1. What are the core principles of Taylor's Scientific Management?
F.W. Taylor's Scientific Management is built on four core principles designed to improve industrial efficiency:
- Science, not Rule of Thumb: Replacing old, intuitive work methods with a scientific study of each task to find the most efficient way to perform it.
- Harmony, not Discord: Fostering complete harmony and proper understanding between management and workers to work towards organisational goals together, rather than in conflict.
- Cooperation, not Individualism: Promoting mutual cooperation between workers and management. This extends the principle of harmony and requires that work and responsibility are shared equally.
- Development of Each Person: Ensuring the scientific selection, training, and development of workers to their greatest efficiency and prosperity, which in turn benefits the organisation.
2. What is meant by the 'Science, not Rule of Thumb' principle?
The principle of 'Science, not Rule of Thumb' advocates for making decisions based on facts and scientific analysis rather than on intuition, experience, or traditional hit-or-miss methods. Taylor believed that even a small production activity could be scientifically planned. This involves investigating traditional methods, identifying their shortcomings, and developing a more efficient and less tiring method for workers to follow, thereby increasing productivity.
3. Why is F.W. Taylor often called the 'Father of Scientific Management'?
Frederick Winslow Taylor is called the 'Father of Scientific Management' because he was the first person to systematically apply scientific methods to the study of work. Through his book 'The Principles of Scientific Management' (1911), he introduced revolutionary ideas like time and motion studies, functional foremanship, and differential piece-rate systems. His work shifted management thinking from a passive, rule-of-thumb approach to an active, systematic process of optimising productivity and efficiency.
4. How do Taylor's scientific principles apply in a modern business like a fast-food chain?
Modern fast-food chains are prime examples of Taylor's principles in action. For instance:
- Standardisation and Simplification: Every task, from flipping a burger to assembling a sandwich, is standardised to ensure consistency and speed across all outlets.
- Time and Motion Studies: The layout of the kitchen and the placement of ingredients are optimised to minimise worker movement and reduce the time taken to prepare an order.
- Scientific Selection and Training: Employees are trained to perform specific, repetitive tasks according to a pre-defined, efficient method.
- Differential Pay: While not always a direct piece-rate system, performance incentives and promotions are often linked to efficiency and adherence to standard procedures.
5. What is the concept of 'Mental Revolution' that Taylor emphasised?
The 'Mental Revolution' is a cornerstone of Scientific Management that involves a complete change in the attitude of both workers and management towards each other and their work. Instead of seeing each other in an adversarial relationship (management wanting more work, workers wanting more pay), both sides should recognise the need for cooperation to increase the company's surplus (profits). Taylor believed that both management and workers should aim for increased production, which would lead to higher profits for the company and better wages for the employees, creating a win-win situation.
6. Explain the technique of 'Functional Foremanship' in scientific management.
Functional Foremanship is a factory management technique that advocates for having multiple specialist foremen supervising workers, rather than a single boss. Taylor separated planning from execution and suggested a total of eight foremen to manage these functions.
- Planning In-charge: Includes Route Clerk, Instruction Card Clerk, Time and Cost Clerk, and a Disciplinarian.
- Production In-charge: Includes Speed Boss, Gang Boss, Repair Boss, and an Inspector.
Each foreman is a specialist in their function, and this division of labour aims to improve the quality of supervision and overall operational efficiency.
7. How does 'Time Study' differ from 'Motion Study' as techniques of scientific management?
While both are used to analyse work, 'Time Study' and 'Motion Study' have different objectives:
- Time Study: Focuses on determining the standard time required to perform a well-defined job. It is conducted to set a fair day's work for an employee and to create incentive schemes.
- Motion Study: Focuses on identifying and eliminating unnecessary or wasteful movements (like lifting, bending, searching for tools) while performing a job. The goal is to design a more efficient workflow that reduces fatigue and improves productivity.
In short, Time Study measures 'how long' a task should take, while Motion Study determines 'how' the task can be done with the least effort.
8. What was the main objective of introducing the 'Differential Piece Wage System'?
The main objective of the 'Differential Piece Wage System' was to create a strong incentive for workers to improve their performance. Under this system, two different wage rates were set: a higher rate for efficient workers who completed the standard task and a lower rate for inefficient workers who failed to do so. This technique was designed to strongly motivate employees to become more efficient and reward high-performing individuals, while simultaneously penalising under-performance.

















