Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store

Point Estimation in Statistics: Key Methods and Formulas

Reviewed by:
ffImage
hightlight icon
highlight icon
highlight icon
share icon
copy icon
SearchIcon

What Is Point Estimation? Definition, Examples, and Applications

In Statistics, Estimation Theory and Hypothesis Testing play a major role in determining solutions to certain problems. Point estimation is one of the areas that help people involved in Statistical analysis come to conclusions regarding many different kinds of questions. Point estimation means using data to calculate the value or the point as it serves as a best guess of any given parameter that may be unknown. 


What is the Definition of Point Estimation?

Point estimators are defined as functions that can be used to find the approximate value of a particular point from a given population parameter. The sample data of a population is used to find a point estimate or a statistic that can act as the best estimate of an unknown parameter that is given for a population. 


What are the Properties of Point Estimators? 

It is desirable for a point estimate to be the following :

  • Consistent - We can say that the larger is the sample size, the more accurate is the estimate. 

  • Unbiased - The expectation of the observed values of various samples equals the corresponding population parameter. Let’s take, for example, We can say that sample mean is an unbiased estimator for the population mean.

  • Most Efficient That is also Known as Best Unbiased - of all the various consistent, unbiased estimates, the one possessing the smallest variance (a measure of the amount of dispersion away from the estimate). In simple words, we can say that the estimator varies least from sample to sample and this generally depends on the particular distribution of the population. For example, the mean is more efficient than the median (that is the middle value) for the normal distribution but not for more “skewed” ( also known as asymmetrical) distributions.


What are the Methods Used to Calculate Point Estimators?

The maximum likelihood method is a popularly used way to calculate point estimators. This method uses differential calculus to understand the probability function from a given number of sample parameters. 


Named after Thomas Bayes, the Bayesian method is another way using which the frequency function of a parameter can be understood. This is a more non-traditional approach. However, in this case, enough information on the distribution of the parameter is not always given but in case it is, then the estimation can be done fairly easily. 


What are the Formulae that Can be Used to Measure Point Estimators? 

Some common formulae include: 

  • Maximum Likelihood Estimation or MLE

  • Jeffrey Estimation

  • Wilson Estimation

  • Laplace Estimation


What are the Values Needed to Calculate Point Estimators?

  • The number of successes is shown by S.

  • The number of trials is shown by T.

  • The Z–score is shown by z. 


Once You Know All the Values Listed Above, You Can Start Calculating the Point Estimate According to the Following Given Equations:

  • Maximum Likelihood Estimation: MLE = S / T

  • Laplace Estimation: Laplace equals (S + 1) / (T + 2)

  • Jeffrey Estimation: Jeffrey equals (S + 0.5) / (T + 1)

  • Wilson Estimation: Wilson equals (S + z²/2) / (T + z²)


Once All Four Values have been Calculated, You Need to Choose the Most Accurate One.


This should be done According to the Following Rules Listed below:

  • If the value of  MLE ≤ 0.5, the Wilson Estimation is the most accurate.

  • If the value of MLE - 0.5 < MLE < 0.9, then the Maximum Likelihood Estimation is the most accurate.

  • If 0.9 < MLE, then the smaller of Jeffrey and Laplace Estimations is said to be the most accurate.

Best Seller - Grade 12 - JEE
View More>
Previous
Next

FAQs on Point Estimation in Statistics: Key Methods and Formulas

1. What is point estimation in statistics?

Point estimation is a method in inferential statistics that uses a single value, known as a point estimate, to approximate an unknown population parameter. This estimate is calculated from a sample of data drawn from the population. For instance, the sample mean (x̄) is commonly used as a point estimate for the unknown population mean (μ).

2. Why is point estimation important in statistical analysis?

Point estimation is crucial because it provides a single, easy-to-understand 'best guess' for a population characteristic without needing to analyse the entire population, which can be impractical or impossible. It forms the basis for making decisions and drawing conclusions in various fields, such as:

  • Quality Control: Estimating the average defect rate in a production line.
  • Finance: Estimating the expected return of an investment.
  • Public Health: Estimating the proportion of a population immune to a disease.

3. How do you calculate a point estimate? Provide a simple example.

To calculate a point estimate, you first choose a sample statistic that corresponds to the population parameter you want to estimate. For example, to find a point estimate for the average height of all Class 12 students in a city (the population parameter), you would:

  1. Collect a random sample of, say, 100 students.
  2. Measure the height of each student in the sample.
  3. Calculate the sample mean (the average height of these 100 students).

This calculated sample mean is the point estimate for the average height of all Class 12 students in the city.

4. What is the main difference between point estimation and interval estimation?

The main difference lies in the value they provide as an estimate. A point estimate gives a single numerical value as the best guess for a parameter (e.g., the average score is 75). In contrast, an interval estimate provides a range of values within which the parameter is likely to fall, along with a confidence level (e.g., we are 95% confident the average score is between 72 and 78). Interval estimation acknowledges the uncertainty inherent in sampling, which a single point estimate does not.

5. What are the key properties of a good point estimator?

A good point estimator should be as close to the true population parameter as possible. Its quality is judged by three main properties:

  • Unbiasedness: An estimator is unbiased if its expected value (the average of estimates from all possible samples) is equal to the true population parameter. It doesn't systematically overestimate or underestimate.
  • Efficiency: An efficient estimator is one that has the smallest variance among all other unbiased estimators. This means it is more precise and its values are less spread out.
  • Consistency: An estimator is consistent if its accuracy increases as the sample size grows. In other words, the estimate gets closer to the true parameter value as more data is collected.

6. What are the common methods used for finding a point estimate?

While simple statistics like the sample mean can be intuitive estimators, more formal methods exist to derive them, especially for complex distributions. Two of the most common methods taught in statistics are:

  • Method of Moments (MOM): This technique involves equating the sample moments (like the sample mean and variance) to the corresponding population moments and then solving for the unknown parameter(s).
  • Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE): This is a very popular method that determines the value of the parameter that maximises the likelihood function, meaning it finds the parameter value that makes the observed sample data most probable.

7. Can you give a real-world example of where point estimation is used?

A common real-world example is in election polling. Before an election, polling agencies survey a small sample of voters to estimate the proportion of the entire voting population that supports a particular candidate. If a poll of 1,500 voters finds that 48% plan to vote for Candidate A, that 48% is a point estimate of the true percentage of all voters who support Candidate A.

8. Does a point estimate give the true value of a population parameter?

No, a point estimate is an approximation and is rarely the exact true value of the population parameter. Because the estimate is based on a random sample rather than the entire population, there is almost always some degree of sampling error. A point estimate provides the 'best guess' based on the available data, but it is critical to understand that it is just an estimate, not a definitive value.